# rasavaha srotas (रसवहस्रोतस्)

> Canonical version of this page: https://nighantu.ageayurveda.com/lexicon/rasavaha-srotas/

An Ayurvedic technical term, rendered into English in 6 different ways.
The renderings do not agree, and the difference between them changes what the term is taken
to mean.

## Identification

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Transliteration | rasavaha srotas |
| Devanagari | रसवहस्रोतस् |
| Also written | rasavahāni srotāṃsi, rasavāhīni srotāṃsi (Ca.Vi.5/13), rasavahasrotaḥ |
| Category, as gathered | srotas (body channel) — anatomy/physiology |
| Grouped under | Body: tissues, wastes and channels |
| Classical citations | 3 |
| Citations checked | 2026-10-08 |

## How it is translated, and whether the translation holds

Each rendering is given with the source that uses it. The assessment is ours.

### Channel carrying nutrient fluids

WHO International Standard Terminologies on Ayurveda (2022) · ITA-2.5.10 · standards-body comparator

WHO description: 'The pathway mediating and distributing the primary circulating nutrient fluid to the body tissues. Entities related to this channel are the heart and vessels carrying primary circulating nutrient fluid.' WHO consistently renders rasa as 'primary circulating nutrient fluid', avoiding both 'plasma' and 'lymph'.

Reproduced unaltered and attributed from the WHO International Standard Terminologies on Ayurveda, which is what that
licence permits, and deliberately absent from the downloadable dataset, which is CC BY 4.0.

### Vitiation of channels carrying primary product of digestion

WHO International Standard Terminologies on Ayurveda (2022) · ITA-5.5.5 rasavahasrotoduṣṭiḥ · standards-body comparator (disorder term)

Note WHO uses a DIFFERENT English head-term for the disorder ('primary product of digestion') than for the anatomy ('nutrient fluids'), an internal inconsistency worth recording.

Reproduced unaltered and attributed from the WHO International Standard Terminologies on Ayurveda, which is what that
licence permits, and deliberately absent from the downloadable dataset, which is CC BY 4.0.

### channels carrying nutrient fluids

NAMASTE Portal, Standardised Ayurveda Terminologies · SAT-B.479 · national terminology comparator

Definition names 'hṛdaya and rasavaha dhamanī' as origin, i.e. NAMASTE follows Suśruta's dhamanī root, not Caraka's 'ten dhamanīs'.

Reproduced unaltered and attributed from the Government of India NAMASTE terminology, which is what that
licence permits, and deliberately absent from the downloadable dataset, which is CC BY 4.0.

### derangement of channels-rasavaha srotas

NAMASTE National Ayurveda Morbidity Codes · NAMC EC-1, referenced to Ca.Vi.5/8 · morbidity-code comparator

Reproduced unaltered and attributed from the Government of India NAMASTE terminology, which is what that
licence permits, and deliberately absent from the downloadable dataset, which is CC BY 4.0.

### The serumcarrying (Rasa-vaha) ducts

Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna, Sushruta Samhita (1911) · Śārīrasthāna IX.11–12 · public-domain translation

Bhishagratna renders rasa as 'serum' here and as 'lymph-chyle' elsewhere in the same chapter ('carry the Rasa (lymph-chyle) throughout the organism'), the 1911 translation is not self-consistent.

### rasa dhatu or plasma

carakasamhitaonline.com (CSRTSL), 2020 · Sroto Vimana 5/6-7 commentary · modern translation (in copyright; rendering recorded as comparator only)

## The classical passages

### Caraka Saṃhitā Vimāna Sthāna 5:5/8, checked against the source

> रसवहानां स्रोतसां हृदयं मूलं दश च धमन्यः|

Sanskrit mūla · https://www.carakasamhitaonline.com/index.php/Sroto_Vimana

Root = hṛdaya and the TEN dhamanīs. Caraka gives no separate vitiation signs here, referring instead to the dhātu-pradoṣa signs of Sūtrasthāna 'Vividhāśitapītīya'.

### Caraka Saṃhitā Vimāna Sthāna 5:5/8 (closing clause of the section), checked against the source

> प्रदुष्टानां तु खल्वेषां रसादिवहस्रोतसां विज्ञानान्युक्तानि विविधाशितपीतीये; यान्येव हि धातूनां प्रदोषविज्ञानानि तान्येव यथास्वं प्रदुष्टानां धातुस्रोतसाम्|

Sanskrit mūla · https://www.carakasamhitaonline.com/index.php/Sroto_Vimana

Caraka explicitly defers the vitiation signs of the seven dhātu-carrying srotas (rasa onwards) to the Vividhāśitapītīya chapter, and equates dhātu-pradoṣa signs with dhātu-srotas signs. This is why Ca.Vi.5 is NOT a complete source for rasavaha/raktavaha/etc. symptomatology.

### Suśruta Saṃhitā Śārīra Sthāna 9:11–12 (Bhishagratna); cited as 9/12 elsewhere, checked against the source

> The serumcarrying (Rasa-vaha) ducts are two in number and have their roots in (the viscus of) the heart and the serum-carrying Dhamanis (vessels). An injury to or piercing of any of these ducts gives rise to Sosha (consumption) and symptoms identical with those developed by a hurt to the Prana-vaha channels of the body, ending in death.

tr. Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna (1911) · https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/sushruta-samhita-volume-3-sharirasthana/d/doc142889.html

Suśruta's root = heart + rasa-carrying dhamanīs (not 'ten'); injury yields śoṣa plus prāṇavaha-type signs.

## Not to be confused with

- **rasa dhātu.** rasa is the substance; rasavaha srotas is its conduit. Caraka's own Vi.5/4 warns that what the srotas are, what they carry, and where they sit are all different from the srotas themselves.
- **rasāyanī / rasavāhinī.** Caraka lists rasāyanī and rasavāhinī at Vi.5/9 as SYNONYMS in the general list of names for body spaces, not as a distinct channel. Treating them as separate structures is an error.
- **prāṇavaha srotas.** Suśruta gives both the same root (heart) and says injury to rasavaha produces prāṇavaha-type signs; they are separated by what they carry, not by location.
- **raktavaha srotas.** rasa is converted to rakta; the channels are consecutive in the dhātu chain but have different roots (heart/dhamanīs vs liver/spleen).

## Renderings that do not hold

- the lymphatic system. Bhishagratna's 'lymph-chyle' gloss and the fluid-transport imagery drive this, but the named root is the heart and the ten dhamanīs, a vascular, not lymphatic, anatomy. WHO deliberately avoids 'lymph'.
- plasma. Convenient but reductive: rasa is the whole post-digestive nutrient fluid and the first of seven dhātus, not the acellular fraction of blood. WHO's 'primary circulating nutrient fluid' is the more careful rendering.
- serum. Bhishagratna's 1911 choice; he uses 'lymph-chyle' for the same word elsewhere in the same chapter, so the rendering carries no authority.

## Open questions

Recorded rather than resolved.

- What are the 'daśa dhamanyaḥ' of Ca.Vi.5/8, and are they the same ten that Cakrapāṇi (on Ca.Indriya 5/41-42) associates with manovaha srotas?
- Why does WHO use two different English head-terms for the anatomy (2.5.10) and the disorder (5.5.5) of the same channel?

## Citation

Age Ayurveda Nighantu, "rasavaha srotas", https://nighantu.ageayurveda.com/lexicon/rasavaha-srotas/, CC BY 4.0.
Whole lexicon: https://nighantu.ageayurveda.com/lexicon.json and https://nighantu.ageayurveda.com/lexicon.csv.

Educational reference only. A term entry explains what a word means and how it has been
translated. Nothing here is advice.
